Subject: | Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording? |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:06 am ((PST)) |
<<"When you hear a Telinga SSM demo track at the Telinga site or SoundCloud, and there is no information about it, do you presume that... 1/ the track is raw, free from any kind of manipulation, or 2/ a end result, post produced to give the best sound?>> Raw. <<And based on what?>> Based on the fact that we are listening to a product demonstration, rather = than to an aesthetic experience. Truth in advertising demands that the prod= uct be depicted as it truly sounds. Any subsequent 'improving' of the sound= or specs of the product via post-production techniques would be deceptive = or fraudulent. As long as the intent is to present the actual sound of the = microphone, we must hear only the output of the mic with no further manipul= ation. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Avlex M-S mic, Mike Rooke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Keith Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, vickipowys |
Next by Thread: | Re: was: What is a good nature sound recording?, Keith Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU