| Subject: | Re: question about new Olympus LS-100 purchase |
|---|---|
| From: | "Chris Edwards" chris2edwards |
| Date: | Wed May 30, 2012 6:35 am ((PDT)) |
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Mike Rooke wrote: > Check if this is also the case for other sample rates Ive found delay in= > monitoring with some recorders that are decimating from a higher sample > rate, e.g 96K native to 48K user selected. switching to 96K may improve > the delay. I recall it did with the LS10 using Edirol binaural mics. Didn't realise the LS-10 had a monitoring delay. Is it anything like 0.2s = ? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: question about new Olympus LS-100 purchase, Mike Rooke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question about new Olympus LS-100 purchase, Jez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: question about new Olympus LS-100 purchase, Mike Rooke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: question about new Olympus LS-100 purchase, Jez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU