| Subject: | 2. Re: SD 7 series recorders with / without a 302 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Munir kureshi" |
| Date: | Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:10 pm ((PDT)) |
I have been recording with SD 788t SSD at 24/96 for about five months. Sent from my iPad On Apr 18, 2012, at 7:48 PM, "jtudor2005" <> wrote: > > > --- In Munir kureshi <>= wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Thank you for the information you provided. I will post my opinion afte= r I get to see SD demo in November. > > > > Just be aware that the 788 won't record at high sample rates (tops at 48i= sh I think) Whereas I always record at 24/96. So that alone woould be the d= eal braker for me on the 788. There has been much discussion on the SD foru= m from users wanting at least 96 when using a reduced channel count. > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 1. Re: SD 7 series recorders with / without a 302, jtudor2005 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What metadata to record?, gweddig |
| Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: SD 7 series recorders with / without a 302, Dan Dugan |
| Next by Thread: | 3. Re: SD 7 series recorders with / without a 302, hartogj |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU