Subject: | 4. Re: noisy 8020 mics - update |
---|---|
From: | "vickipowys" vpowys |
Date: | Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:41 pm ((PST)) |
Dan, I have now updated the 'recording-gear-2' page on my website. I tried the 8020s (with the front sticking out a bit) in a foam SASS and they seemed to work fine. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction! Vicki On 22/11/2011, at 2:01 AM, Dan Dugan wrote: >> http://www.caperteebirder.com/index.php?p=3D1_27_recording-gear-2 > > On that page you say: > >> MKH 8020 not suitable for SASS: >> One drawback to the 8020s is that the mic element is set 5-10 mm >> inside the mic housing, rather than flush with the surface, making >> the mic unsuitable for SASS-style of mounting. (For SASS the mic >> element needs to be flush with the boundary surface). > > This is not a problem! Let the mic stick out from the surface of > the baffle (SASS or whatever kind of baffle you want the mic to be > flush-mounted in) so that the diaphragm of the capsule inside the > housing is level with the baffle surface. > > -Dan > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Re: noisy 8020 mics - update, vickipowys |
---|---|
Next by Date: | digital playback solutions, John |
Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: noisy 8020 mics - update, Avocet |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nature Recordists] Re: What? John Hartog on Oregon Field Gui=, vickipowys |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU