Subject: | Re: What's everybody's favourite parabolic microphone setup? |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:36 am ((PDT)) |
<<I ask because a friend tells me that he believes sound recorded on a Zoom at 16 bit / 48kHz would sound much the same as the same sound recorded on a camera at 16 bit/48kHz.>> While the analog to digital conversion rate may be identical, nothing else = is necessarily the same with the two systems. With current digital audio re= cording the conversion is fairly uniformly good with modern AD converters. = What separates the merely good from the exceptional as well as the awful is= all the analog stages prior to the conversion into bits. High quality anal= og microphone preamps are very expensive & the difference between 'good eno= ugh' & 'outstanding' preamps is audibly very dramatic. 16 bits at 48kHz CAN= sound extremely good, or it can merely render a poor analog stage accurate= ly as the piece of cheap electronics that it is. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: What's everybodies favourite parabolic microphone setup?, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: What's everybody's favourite parabolic microphone setup?, umashankar |
Previous by Thread: | Re: What's everybody's favourite parabolic microphone setup?, Marc Myers |
Next by Thread: | Re: What's everybody's favourite parabolic microphone setup?, umashankar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU