> what makes me curious is why everybody buys sound devices and not a
> sonosax. it seems to be high quality and they are a bit cheaper than
> the SD.. (at leats when you need 4 preamp channels.)
> i understand that for production sound it features do not compare to
> the sound devices (thats what i heared), but thats not important for
> us nature recordists.
My caution about Sonosax comes from doing repair work and has nothing to do=
with recording quality. Sonosax gear is difficult to repair and response f=
rom the factory is arbitrary--sometimes they just ignore questions. Sound D=
evices is responsive and helpful.
-Dan
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|