[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sonosax SX-R4

Subject: Re: Sonosax SX-R4
From: "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999
Date: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:17 pm ((PDT))
> what makes me curious is why everybody buys sound devices and not a
> sonosax. it seems to be high quality and they are a bit cheaper than
> the SD.. (at leats when you need 4 preamp channels.)
> i understand that for production sound it features do not compare to
> the sound devices (thats what i heared), but thats not important for
> us nature recordists.

My caution about Sonosax comes from doing repair work and has nothing to do=
 with recording quality. Sonosax gear is difficult to repair and response f=
rom the factory is arbitrary--sometimes they just ignore questions. Sound D=
evices is responsive and helpful.


"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU