Subject: | Re: Sonosax SX-R4 |
---|---|
From: | "David Moon" davimon100 |
Date: | Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:56 am ((PDT)) |
Ref. SX-R4. Without wishing to invite Fate to come looking, I have not had any problems with the SX-R4 It seems pretty well built to me and I'm not one for throwing it around, submerging it or generally giving it a bad day. I know that SD is a much bigger enterprise than Sonosax, with more dealers, so should be able to offer a better support network. To an extent you pay for what goes in the box. I'm sure that both SD and Sonosax put lots of the good bits in a robust case. There's not much that can go wrong wrong with them, I guess. If SD show up occasional errors it could be purely a reflection of the greater volume sold. Since we tend to extrapolate from the bad rather than the good the stats on this can become easily distorted. If any members of the group in the SE of the UK want to meet up and try out the SX-R4 - or have a SD7xx they want to compare it with, let me know. David -- David Moon |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Mic Body Size for Frogloggers BT 172-BI / Windscreen Recommendat, Mike Rooke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Spaces Still Available at NSS Workshop 6/24-/626, sperry1969 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Sonosax SX-R4, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Sonosax SX-R4, emil klotzsch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU