Subject: | Re: PBB2N vs Jecklin Disk Recordings & Tests |
---|---|
From: | "Rick Munday" baumann1965 |
Date: | Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:05 pm ((PDT)) |
That's pretty impressive! Still steady listening and looking at the comparisons. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Rob Danielson <> wrote: > > > Hi-- > There were a couple of threads in which we discussing performance > differences between Jecklin Disk and DIY SASS arrays. I've finished > posting my comparisons of the arrays on the DIY Boundary Mics blog: > > > http://diystereoboundarymics.blogspot.com/2010/10/pbb2n-jecklin-disk-reco= rdings.html > > The report incorporates several factors I learned from tests Vicki > Powys did > > http://diystereoboundarymics.blogspot.com/2010/10/capsule-size-boundary-m= aterial-affect.html > and some of Paul Jacobson's time consuming assessments of Vicki's tests. > Rob D. > > =3D =3D =3D > -- > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Going to buy a Rode NT-1A. How connect it to Hi-MD?, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: PBB2N vs Jecklin Disk Recordings & Tests, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | PBB2N vs Jecklin Disk Recordings & Tests, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: PBB2N vs Jecklin Disk Recordings & Tests, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU