Hi Rick--
Let me know on or off list if you have questions.
Its the first time we've used polar plots in our
discussions and explanations and they're not easy
to interpret.
The imagery created by the two arrays has a
closer gestalt than I would have guessed.
Hopefully people are able to hear some
performance differences themselves. I enjoy
hearing about different impressions. I used only
speaker monitoring in reaching my observations.
Rob D.
=3D =3D =3D
At 9:57 PM -0500 10/16/10, Rick Munday wrote:
>That's pretty impressive! Still steady listening and looking at the
>comparisons.
>
>On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi--
>> There were a couple of threads in which we discussing performance
>> differences between Jecklin Disk and DIY SASS arrays. I've finished
>> posting my comparisons of the arrays on the DIY Boundary Mics blog:
>>
>>
>>
>>http://diystereoboundarymics.blogspot.com/2010/10/pbb2n-jecklin-disk-reco=
rdings.html
>>
>> The report incorporates several factors I learned from tests Vicki
>> Powys did
>>
>>
>>http://diystereoboundarymics.blogspot.com/2010/10/capsule-size-boundary-m=
aterial-affect.html
>> and some of Paul Jacobson's time consuming assessments of Vicki's tests=
.
>> Rob D.
>>
>> =3D =3D =3D
>> --
>>
>>=C2=A0
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
--
|