naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PBB2N vs Jecklin Disk Recordings & Tests

Subject: Re: PBB2N vs Jecklin Disk Recordings & Tests
From: "Rick Munday" baumann1965
Date: Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:08 pm ((PDT))
It was enough for me to know that I want to build the PBB2N as per the plan=
s
and experiment with a few mics.

I found the PBB2Ns separation and tone to have a more "real" feel. I've
noticed in some of the recordings posted in the group that not all of the
various rigs give me the feeling of being there. I realize you "sent" the
audio from a surround sound setup (as per post), but with that in mind I
felt like I was sitting there.



On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Rob Danielson <> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Rick--
> Let me know on or off list if you have questions.
> Its the first time we've used polar plots in our
> discussions and explanations and they're not easy
> to interpret.
>
> The imagery created by the two arrays has a
> closer gestalt than I would have guessed.
> Hopefully people are able to hear some
> performance differences themselves. I enjoy
> hearing about different impressions. I used only
> speaker monitoring in reaching my observations.
> Rob D.
>
>









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU