Subject: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing |
---|---|
From: | "im_rawes" im_rawes |
Date: | Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:41 pm ((PDT)) |
--- In Dan Dugan <> wrote: > > > Just curious: Can a human hear and distinguish more acutely than a > > computer spectrogram can display or visualize? > > I would say yes and no--If you can hear something, you can adjust a spect= rogram software to show it, but there's no one setting that would show ever= ything you can hear. > > -Dan > The spectrogram has the advantage of turning a time-based auditory experien= ce into a visual depiction where sounds of a shortish duration can be inspe= cted at leisure. But the spectrogram's plot shows no auditory intelligence, so to speak. It = cannot parse an auditory scene into its component sound objects in the way = that our sense of hearing does effortlessly. (Mind you, I still like looking at spectrograms.) Ian - - London Sound Survey http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk Supporting Deafness Research UK http://www.deafnessresearch.org.uk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Mike Rooke |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Mike Rooke |
Next by Thread: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU