| Subject: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing |
|---|---|
| From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
| Date: | Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:44 pm ((PDT)) |
> Just curious: Can a human hear and distinguish more acutely than a > computer spectrogram can display or visualize? I would say yes and no--If you can hear something, you can adjust a spectro= gram software to show it, but there's no one setting that would show everyt= hing you can hear. -Dan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing?, Thomas Ashcraft |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing?, Thomas Ashcraft |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU