Subject: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing |
---|---|
From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
Date: | Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:22 pm ((PDT)) |
At 4:44 PM -0700 8/14/10, Dan Dugan wrote: > > > > Just curious: Can a human hear and distinguish more acutely than a >> computer spectrogram can display or visualize? > >I would say yes and no--If you can hear something, you can adjust a >spectrogram software to show it, but there's no one setting that >would show everything you can hear. > >-Dan > None of the sonogram tools I've used have come very close. Maybe I'm not using them to their full abilities or using the right tools. It not unusual for me to discern differences of 1/2 dB and 1/24th of an octave while making adjustments by ear. The sonogram apps I routinely use have a minimum amplitude range of 20dB. Are there sonogram apps that can distinguish fractions of a dB while only examining a 1/4 of an octave? This would be a very useful tool if it could also display these factors in real time. Rob D. -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Which is more sensitive? - spectrogram software or human hearing, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU