Subject: | Re: plug-in power mic |
---|---|
From: | "Curt Olson" flipov411 |
Date: | Sun Jul 4, 2010 7:34 am ((PDT)) |
raimund wrote: > Mike Rooke wrote: > >> Ive used three <part number that shall not be named by me in order >> to respect Telinga's wish many moons ago that we don't discuss part >> numbers> dangling off the PIP supply from a Sony D50, by "reliable" >> do you mean giving the same sensitivity as a single capsule or >> something else? > > > Hi Mike, > > By reliable I mean the PIP voltage level under load conditions. In > my tests with the M10, the voltage heavily floated around below 1 V > (if I remember correctly). The D50 provided much better results in > that regard. > > Unfortunately, I did not measured the resulting sensitivity. > > Regards, > raimund So guys, you're saying that mic sensitivity will vary with PIP voltage? Is this limited to the unnamed capsules Mike has tested, or is this a general rule of thumb that will apply to other PIP mics also, like WL-183s? Curt Olson |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Post Processing -- what's legit and useful, from various points, jtudor2005 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: New here, with question about phantom power rigs, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: plug-in power mic, Raimund |
Next by Thread: | Re: plug-in power mic, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU