I was just needing info on the internal mics, Rob. But thanks for
that. It confirms what I'm hearing on playback.
The M4 sounds pretty good with the Senn MS system and the PDAs, though.
BK
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Rob Danielson wrote:
> Hi Bernie--
> It depends on the mics that are going to be used and the primary
> application.
>
> If the internal mics are going to be used, enough recordists have
> confirmed Sony's noise specs to suggest to me that the Sony M10 is
> "enough better" in terms of mic self-noise/pre noise so that the
> Zooms wouldn't be a contender. D50 is slightly better/bigger. I use
> an H2 with an MP2/line input and its okay for that.
>
> If with external mics, we need to know which mics and what
> application. Rob D.
>
> =3D =3D =3D
>
> At 1:30 PM -0700 3/16/10, Bernie Krause wrote:
>>
>>
>> This may have already been addressed, but I haven't recently been
>> following the threads. Question: Has anyone done an audio quality
>> comparison (noise, freq response, etc) between the Zoom H2, H4n, and
>> Q3? If so, what did you find?
>>
>> Bernie
>>
>> Wild Sanctuary
>> POB 536
>> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
>> 707-996-6677
>> <http://www.wildsanctuary.com>http://www.wildsanctuary.com
>> <chirp%40wildsanctuary.com>
>> Google Earth zooms:
>> <http://earth.wildsanctuary.com>http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
>> SKYPE: biophony
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie
> Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony
|