| Subject: | 2. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test |
|---|---|
| From: | "hartogj" hartogj |
| Date: | Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:41 pm ((PST)) |
> According to my own experience in electronics, it is however >extremely d= ifficult to integrate all these requirements into a single >unit. As in man= y other fields of technology, there are numerous >technical constraints tha= t force the designers to make certain >compromises. Considering these probl= ems, I believe that Sony did a >great job with their new PCM-M10. > You are most likely right, Raimund. They compromised higher quality preamps for longer battery life. This limit= s its use with external microphones, but then the improvement in internal m= icrophone self-noise makes it look pretty good as an all in one, ultra port= able recorder. What can you say about its stereo image? John Hartog |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 1. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Raimund |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 3. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Michael Raphael |
| Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Raimund |
| Next by Thread: | 2. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test, Raimund |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU