naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

2. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test

Subject: 2. Re: SONY PCM-M10 noise test
From: "Raimund" animalsounds
Date: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:50 am ((PST))
Yes Mike, the low-frequency response is quite good. Actually, I should have 
better used a wind screen for the recording of the Robin this morning because 
there are a lot of clipping artifacts in that recording.

Raimund 

Mike Rooke wrote:

> Raimund,
> 
> Thank you :)
> 
> Looks like the internal mics are quite sensitive below 10Hz. The lows seem 
> similar to the R09HR which makes me question my comment about the LS10 not 
> having a low cut on even when its off. 
> 
> Considering the M10s battery life and low noise internal mics its rather 
> good. Would be interesting to see how it sounds with the RME QuadMic via the 
> line input.
> 
> Added to the shopping list.
> 
> BR
> Mike.
 
> > > Okay, here are two short recordings. The fist one is a European Robin 
> > > recorded this morning in my backyard. There is some traffic noise in the 
> > > background and also some handing noise because I was in a hurry:
> > > 
> > > http://www.avisoft.com/scratch/SONY_PCM_M10_Berlin_Robin.wav
> > > 
> > > (It is a normalized 16 bit version of the original 24 bit version.)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This is the noise in my office:
> > > 
> > > http://www.avisoft.com/scratch/SONY_PCM_M10_Office.wav
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Raimund
> > >
> >
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU