naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SONY PCM-D50 field recordings with inbuilt mics

Subject: Re: SONY PCM-D50 field recordings with inbuilt mics
From: "picnet2" picnet2
Date: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:28 am ((PDT))
Hi,
    The Edirol R09HR's internal mics respond at > 40 Khz, heres a sonogram of 
an ultrasonic mouse repeller: 

http://urlme.net/bl/pests/mouse.png

Baudline can filter, decimate and shift frequencies around.

An example: Not quite nature, but can anyone guess what this is?
http://www.urlme.net/bl/rec/mystery1.wav
(Warning, loud high pitched tones, turn volume down before playing)

BR,
Mike.



--- In  "Raimund Specht" <> 
wrote:
>
> Hi Phil and Patrick,
> 
> yes, it is indeed very simple to make this kind of conversion. I used the 
> (expensive) Avisoft-SASLab Pro software 
> (http://www.avisoft.com/soundanalysis.htm) for this, but it can also be made 
> with any other sound editing software such as Audacity. On Audacity, the 
> corresponding command is titled "Set Rate" > "Other...", which can be found 
> on the pop-up menu that appears when you click at the tiny black arrow on the 
> left of the track representation.
> 
> I just investigated the frequency response of the PCM D-50 microphones a bit 
> further. They seem to be quite sensitive up to about 30 kHz. That's the 
> reason why they worked so good for the relatively low-frequency echolocation 
> calls of the Noctule bat. They still work beyond 30 kHz, but the sensitivity 
> drops significantly at those frequencies. So, the results would not be as 
> good when recording other bat species such the Pipistrelle for instance.
> 
> Regards,
> Raimund  
> 
> --- In  ". m u r m e r ." <murmer@> wrote:
> >
> > Raimund Specht wrote:
> > > 2. Modifying the sample rate attribute in the file header from 96 kHz to 
> > > 5.5 kHz, which stretches the time scale by a factor of 17.45 = 96 kHz / 
> > > 5.5 kHz. As a result, the ultrasonic bat calls move down into our hearing 
> > > range.
> > 
> > 
> > forgive me if this is a foolish question, but how do you directly modify 
> > the sample rate attribute in a soundfile header?  do you need a 
> > particular piece of software?  this seems like a spookily simple way to 
> > do a basic time-stretch, quite enticing...
> > 
> > best,
> > patrick
> > 
> > -- 
> 
> 
> --- In  Philip Tyler <macmang4125@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Raimund
> > 
> > Many thanks for the info. I understand everything except the "Modifying the 
> > sample rate attribute in the file header"?
> > 
> > What do you use to do that, if I may ask?
> > 
> > Regards 
> > 
> > Phil
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU