naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A quick and dirty comparison of some handheld recorders

Subject: Re: A quick and dirty comparison of some handheld recorders
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:27 pm ((PDT))
At 9:13 PM -0400 7/18/09, Matt Blaze wrote:
>
>On Jul 18, 2009, at 16:39, Rob Danielson wrote:
>  > The dog is portrayed on the left with the M-S array and slightly to
>  > the left with the H4n's and your mystery rig. He's in the center on
>>  the others. Rob D.
>
>Really? That's not quite my perception. I agree the dog is in the
>middle (tho a bit on the left) on the Nagra and LS10, but it seems mid-
>left on the Sonys and the H4n and harder left on the MS and mystery
>mic, to my ears. I believe the dog was at about 45 degrees left in
>reality, but I'm not totally sure. There was also considerable
>reverberation off the house directly to the front.
>
>Best,
>
>-matt
>

Hi Matt--
I evaluated the localization performance again, this time as a blind 
test.  With 12:00 (o'clock) being center and with speakers at 30 
degrees left and right, I judged the medium distance dog bark to be 
coming from these positions:

Sennheiser MKH-800      10:30
Sony PCM-D1             12:00
Sony PCM-D50            11:30
Zoom H4n                10:00
Olympus LS-10           12:00
Nagra ARES-MII          12:00
Mystery Mic             10:00

The M-S rig has better depth imaging in this sample and much wider 
imaging for sounds spread out along the horizon in the suburban 
presence. Rob D.


-- 







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU