naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stereo techniques for outdoor soundscapes

Subject: Re: Stereo techniques for outdoor soundscapes
From: "Matt Blaze" matthew.blaze
Date: Mon Jul 6, 2009 10:39 pm ((PDT))
John,

Thanks very much for the comments.

Your point about all recording being about illusion is well
taken.  I think an analogy with photography may be useful
here.  The f/64 group (Weston, Adams, etc) advanced an ideal
of "straight photography", aiming to be devoid of "artistic"
manipulation and presenting a simple, direct perspective on
the world as it is found. It's ultimately impossible, of
course -- all photography, like all recording, involves
inherent creative manipulation through choices, selection,
and so on, but it does clearly stake out an aesthetic territory
that describes quite a bit of what many nature recordists seem
to be trying to achieve.

It's interesting that the heyday of the f/64 group was a time
when photography wasn't yet fully recognized as a legitimate art
from of its own -- a state of affairs from which, I fear, field
recording still largely suffers.

Best

-matt


On Jul 6, 2009, at 23:06, John Hartog wrote:

> Hi Matt
> It's good to have new perspectives -- so please no apologies for
> barging in.
>
> Thanks for the link to your webpage and sound clips.  I like the way
> you introduce the natural soundscape recording subject and set it
> aside from other music with your statements like, ""Ambience" in
> music recording has to do mainly with capturing the effect of the
> subject against the space," and also "Instead, they're usually
> aiming to limit the "recording angle" to the slice where the music
> is coming from and to reduce the effects of everything else."  That
> is all so true.
>
> And while your own statement about natural soundscape recording,
> "the environment is the subject," is also true, I must remind you we
> only ever record a mere slice of this environment.  It has been
> pointed out many times on this group, and most notably by our
> masterful soundscape recordist Bernie Krause, that natural
> soundscape recording is, as with all art, all about creating
> illusions.
>
> In this respect, I view all my own natural soundscape recordings as
> mere slices of much greater concepts. The goal is for this data to
> be interpreted through human minds, so what is important is not how
> real or comprehensive the recording is, but how meaningful the
> recording sounds to the listener.  By simplifying the views, slices,
> or spheres down to meaningful expressions for human perception, I
> can increase the perceived depth and width and relevance of the
> soundscapes I am trying to portray.
>
> In your first example, "Institute Woods," I think the ms sounds
> best, because the frontal focus limits the otherwise confining
> character of the ambient water sounds.
>
> In your second example, "Freight Train" the Jecklin sounds best
> because width is as important as depth to bring meaning to a passing
> train.
>
> In the third example "San Francisco Bay" I think the ms sounds best,
> because it sounds less cluttered than the other two examples.
>
> Your comparisons enlighten listeners to some basic differences
> between different mics and micing techniques, but what is missing is
> that each technique usually takes a unique approach =96 meaning given =

> the same general location, one configuration will sound best placed
> here and another will sound best placed over there.   Very seldom
> will one precise location and orientation be ideal for three
> separate techniques.
>
> John Hartog
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In  "Matt Blaze" <> wrote:
>>
>> First of all, please forgive me for barging in; I've long enjoyed and
>> learned a lot from from this terrific list, but have only rarely
>> actually posted here.
>>
>> Anyway, one of the challenges for me in learning to record good
>> stereo images of outdoor soundscapes has been the relative lack of
>> controlled examples of different miking techniques recorded
>> simultaneously from the same position.  There are some amazing
>> outdoor nature recordings available here and elsewhere, but people
>> tend to distribute only their best results, and keep to themselves
>> the duds recorded along the way.  For the listener, that's surely for
>> the best, of course, but it means that there are lamentably few
>> examples of the same sources recorded simultaneously with different
>> (and documented) techniques from which to learn and compare.
>>
>> So I've slowly been experimenting with different  techniques by
>> making simultaneous recordings in different outdoor environments and
>> of different kinds of subjects.  The effort is paying off well for
>> me, and perhaps others can benefit from my failures (and occasional
>> successes).  So I've collected and posted a few examples on a web
>> page, which I will try to update with new recordings from time to
>> time.  Most of the recordings are decidedly unspectacular,
>> intended primarily to expose the similarities and differences of
>> the images produced by different mic configurations when used
>> outdoors.  Mostly, through, I hope to encourage others to do the
>> same;  my individual effort is really quite pale in the grand
>> scheme of things, limited as it is by my talent, equipment, and
>> rapidly diminishing inclination to carry lots of stuff with me.
>>
>> My sample clips, for what they're worth, can be found at
>> http://www.crypto.com/audio/soundscapes/ .
>>
>> -matt
>>
>>


mab blogs at http://www.crypto.com/blog/





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU