[Top] [All Lists]

Re: headphone RFI

Subject: Re: headphone RFI
From: "" dhole23
Date: Thu Jun 4, 2009 8:29 am ((PDT))
I'll second the hd 25. Apart from the beyerdynamic dt series ( far too 
bulky for field recording ) these are the only headphones Ive found that 
are well built enough and durable. You can replace every part and they 
have made them for years. They arent made for lounging in studios or 
consumer hifi listening which most heaphones are. They are however very 
unforgiving and revealing of environments , giving great detail. I have 
used headphones that just make things sound nice and warm , something I 
dont want in field recording. I have dropped mine on many occasions and 
there is nothing that wants too break, tough as old boots...


Chris Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Nathan Pieplow wrote:
> | I'm in the market for a new pair of headphones, and I'm frustrated
> | with my search. I need something to use in the field with my Fostex
> | FR2-LE and my Telinga stereo parabola. The headphones must have a
> | closed back and a 1/8 inch stereo plug; also, importantly, they must
> | have a straight cord (preferably short).
> I'm a fan of Sennheiser HD25. Good audio quality and isolation, well built,
> and all the parts can easily be replaced individually if need be.
> Note the cheaper HD25-SP is nowhere near as good.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU