| Subject: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
| Date: | Fri Feb 6, 2009 12:07 pm ((PST)) |
At 4:18 PM +0000 2/6/09, John Hartog wrote: >Rob asks, "What's an XLR-1?..." > >It is Sony's phantom power box. Maybe more compact than the Art or >Rolls, but it costs a whole lot more @~ $450. >See: ><http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/product-XLR1/>http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/product-XLR1/ > >John > Whoa! I'm thinking, "pro recorder." With a Fostex, I can use the extra $450 to make up a good part of the price difference between used AT 3032's and their replacement model, the AT 4022's. Has any done side by side testing with the 4022 mics yet? Rob D. -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Using Input Noise Measurements (was Comparative noise levels of xlr, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Sony PCM D50 Test (was Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Philip Tyler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Roger.Norwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU