| Subject: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder |
|---|---|
| From: | "Andrew Carter" standlynch |
| Date: | Fri Feb 6, 2009 10:33 am ((PST)) |
Raimund wrote: >However, I > believe that there must be also something wrong with the D-50 sample > in this test. For instance, it could be that the plug-in power was > activated. Deactivating this PIP option from menu can greatly improve > its noise performance. You may be right Raimund - I cant remembber now. I will see if I can repeat the test and check the result. Andrew |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Raimund Specht |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Philip Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Raimund Specht |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Comparative noise levels of xlr + recorder, Philip Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU