Subject: | Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbon calls |
---|---|
From: | "werainey" werainey |
Date: | Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:47 pm ((PST)) |
The (expensive) commercial hardware sold for localizing gunshots (and other= impulse noises) is along those lines, but 2D (Google Shotspotter for one source). These use= networked arrays of acoustic monitors on telephone poles, etc. distributed over parts of ci= ties. Each monitor has small planar array of microphones. Their product has its origin in w= ork by USGS seismology staff (Menlo Park CA). Bill R. > just a thought experiment. has anybody tried a point source tetrahedra (l= ike the soundfield microphones). you will get no distance information (though you sense it whe= n listening) but you get accurate 3d localisation. may be even a combination; the larger tet= rahedra providing distance information (i do not think=A0it will be accurate for direction) a= nd the small one for direction. > > umashankar |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nature Recordists] estimating direction and distance of gibbo=, Bernie Krause |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbon calls, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbon calls, umashankar |
Next by Thread: | Re: estimating direction and distance of gibbon calls, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU