Subject: | Re: R-09HR, R-44 preamp comparisons |
---|---|
From: | "John Lundsten" lundsten_john |
Date: | Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:29 am ((PDT)) |
I have been doing a number of tests on the R44 & other stuff to hand. for more details from me and others see "Edirol R44" at The EIN Equivalent Input Noise of in my case a 219Ohm dummy load resistor and without the typically used A weighting network are:-- R44 -111.25dB (at max gain, the most favourable EIN) Fostex FR2 -124dB Yamaha O2R -126dB Alice Matchamp +R44 (2) -128.5dB Note the input gain was such that a -45dBu signal (4.4mVolts) gives a 0dB Full Scale recording. This being max gain for the R44 & less than max for the other 3, so the R44 fig is flattering compared to the rest. Re the difference A weighting may make The R44 has less LF noise but it also has less LF response than the other mic amps Simple filtering to get a 200Hz-24k passband improves the FR2 fig by a little over 1dB, I imagine the same would be true of the Yamaha & match amp figs. John L |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: R-09HR, R-44 preamp comparisons, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: R-09HR, R-44 preamp comparisons, oryoki2000 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: R-09HR, R-44 preamp comparisons, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: R-09HR, R-44 preamp comparisons, oryoki2000 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU