naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

2. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED

Subject: 2. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED
From: "Raimund Specht" animalsounds
Date: Wed Jul 2, 2008 7:31 am ((PDT))
Rob Danielson wrote:
>
> A metronome at 5 metres might be a pretty "hot" reference signal.
> Its possible that the "Low Sensitivity" setting might not provide
> sufficient gain for quieter sounds and environments. Its worth
> further investigation, for sure.
>
> Coincidentally, earlier today, I thought of Aaron's DSM temple mount
> preference in relation to your WL-183 rig priorities. Rob D.

Yes, this is a relatively loud test signal. Though, I believe that
this is an adequate model for a loudly singing Lyrebird.

For recording softer sounds, one should perhaps better use the HIGH
MIC SENSE setting. The problem with the Lyrebird was obviously that
the REC LEVEL was turned down to 2, which caused the higher overall
noise level. In other words, it is not appropriate to attenuate the
microphone signal and then amplify it again in the next stage.

Note that the MIC 2 input of the TASCAM DR-1 also provides a
relatively low gain (input clipping level: -28 dBu), while its
inherent noise floor (-115 dBu(A)) is still good enough for the
K6/ME6x series.

Regards,
Raimund








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU