Subject: | Re: Filtering |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:34 am ((PDT)) |
<<The noise removal process you're referring to is based on 'noise printing': taking a sonic fingerprint of the noise and building filter(s) to remove it. The success of the process relies very much on the quality of the noise print used, so it is important to choose a good segment of the recording that has plenty of the noise but no other sounds of interest or value.>> It's been my experience when using BIAS Soundsoap Pro that I always get better results when manually adjusting the threshold & degree of noise reduction for each frequency band, rather than using the noise print facility. I have also not gotten satisfactory results from the iZotope NR software, I suspect because it locks the user out of access to its individual frequency bands. For me, one size doesn't fit all. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Filtering, Scott Fraser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | ME66/K6, Max Catterwell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Filtering, Scott Fraser |
Next by Thread: | Re: Filtering, Greg Simmons |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU