naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock

Subject: Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Wed Jun 4, 2008 9:16 am ((PDT))
True, especially for folks who record short takes. For long takes, 
when synchronizing two or more recorders, its presents a lot of extra 
work and a potential quality hit with the resampling. Also, it kind 
of bothers me that my recorded time would be so far off. I'm curious 
if people will discover that the "drift" is very close to the same 
each time. Rob D.


At 4:57 PM +0100 6/4/08, Max Catterwell wrote:
>In that instance I agree. I wouldn't think too many nature recordists do
>this though? I certainly never will. I can see how it might possible be
>important for extremely critical analysis, but again, I don't think the
>majority are involved in that kind of research.
>Max
>
>Lou Judson wrote:
>>  Maybe not to you... to others maybe it does. To the person syncing to
>>  video, obviously it matters!
>>
>>  <L>
>>  On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Max Catterwell wrote:
>>
>>
>>>  This may be right, but I can't see that it matters?
>>>  Max
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------------
>>
>>  "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>>  sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
>>  Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU