John, apologies are certainly unnecessary! If anyone should apologise
it's me. On reading that mail back I realise it may have sounded a bit
aggressive, which it definitely wasn't intended to be. I should perhaps
have clarified the purchase deal further. I paid even more for my LS-10
than it appears others have. It was approximately =A3250 ($500) including
postage, and the MZ-RH1 (which was new) went for =A3270 plus postage. As
I didn't want to wait until I got lucky enough to strike a better deal,
I went for the LS-10. I am an old man with a couple of serious
illnesses, and consequently time is of the essence as they say.
Regards
Max
John Hartog wrote:
> Max,
> I must apologize. The way the lines broke in my browser, it looked
> like you were saying the ls-10 was for less than $40.
>
> Duh!
> John Hartog
>
>
> --- In "John Hartog"
> <> wrote:
>
>>> Prior to buying mine I was half thinking about getting hold of one of
>>> the obsolete MZ-RH1's, but when one sold on eBay for =A320 ($40) more
>>>
>> than
>>
>>> I could buy an LS-10 for, I changed my mind. I clearly am
>>>
> intending no
>
>> Max,
>> Prices that low seem very unlikely.
>>
>> John Hartog
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
|