Subject: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock |
---|---|
From: | "Max Catterwell" oatcruncher |
Date: | Wed Jun 4, 2008 8:57 am ((PDT)) |
In that instance I agree. I wouldn't think too many nature recordists do this though? I certainly never will. I can see how it might possible be important for extremely critical analysis, but again, I don't think the majority are involved in that kind of research. Max Lou Judson wrote: > Maybe not to you... to others maybe it does. To the person syncing to > video, obviously it matters! > > <L> > On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Max Catterwell wrote: > > >> This may be right, but I can't see that it matters? >> Max >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Max Catterwell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Max Catterwell |
Next by Thread: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU