| Subject: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock |
|---|---|
| From: | "Max Catterwell" oatcruncher |
| Date: | Wed Jun 4, 2008 8:22 am ((PDT)) |
This may be right, but I can't see that it matters? Max Lou Judson wrote: > If the clock inside is off, won't the display also be off? You need > to test it against a known accurate device recording for the same > hour... Right? > > <L> > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:55 PM, oryoki2000 wrote: > > >>> ...The Olympus was 14 seconds off in an hour. >>> >> Reading this, I started my LS-10 recording. After 30 minutes elapsed >> time, the recorder's display was less than one second behind. >> >> Maybe the reported 14 second loss was caused by a weak battery? >> >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Lou Judson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Sound of a 10 mile long Antarctic iceberg scraping the ocean floor, davem98607 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Lou Judson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Olympus LS-10 internal clock, Max Catterwell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU