naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: External mic suggestions for Olympus LS-10

Subject: Re: External mic suggestions for Olympus LS-10
From: "Philip Tyler" macmang4125
Date: Thu May 29, 2008 3:16 am ((PDT))
Hi
=A0
I don't know about the performance of the Samson unit, but both the Rolls a=
nd Art units seem to perform excellently judging by the tests Rob has carri=
ed out.
=A0
But it might be worth pointing out that both the Rolls and Art phantom unit=
s can be powered from 'internal' batteries, looking at the PDF for the Sams=
on it looks like it can only be powered by an external DC supply which plug=
s into it's DC in which you could do. But as=A0the Rolls and Art devices ha=
ve space for internal batteries=A0it would make for a neater unit?
=A0
Phil
=A0



----- Original Message ----
From: oatcruncher <>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, 29 May, 2008 10:08:53 AM
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Re:External mic suggestions for Olympus LS-10


In relation to this, does anyone on the group have experience
of/knowledge of S-phantom power supplies as per this link please?
http://www.samsonte ch.com/products/ productpage. cfm?prodID=3D 1747
Max

--- In naturerecordists@ yahoogroups. com, Rob Danielson <>
wrote:
>
> At 4:49 PM -0700 5/28/08, peter rhalter wrote:
> >The Denecke PS-2 - Portable Dual 48V Phantom Power Supply is
another
> >option. You will also need a double XLR to 3.5mm cable. If the LS-
10
> >provides plug-in power, you may need to either turn it off or
block
> >it to avoid added hum.
> >Peter
> >
> Hi Peter--
> Yes, I can confirm there is a possibility of hum. I found that the
> Denecke PS-2 unit can generate a hum when used with some recorders
> that have Power in Plug (PIP) mic inputs. I got a loud hum with all
> of the Sony and Sharp consumer products I tested and the capacitors
> needed to eliminate it (block the DC) affected LF response more
that
> I would have wanted. The PS-2 may work with the LS-10, but it
might
> be wise to make sure that you can return the unit in case it
doesn't.
>
> I know it seems like using a $40-70 device between expensive mics
and
> a recorder doesn't make sense monetarily, but Eric Benjamin bench
> tested the Rolls unit and found that it will not introduce noise
even
> when used with the the lowest noise, low impedance mics and lowest
> noise recorders. I A/B'd the Rolls and Art and found there is no
> audible difference in the noise performance between the two. Both
> units produce 48 volts.
>
> Curt Olson reported that he removed the Art Phantom II's printed
> circuit board from the metal case (and also left behind the two XLR
> outputs) with no ill effects to make it a much smaller unit.
>
> The phantom supplies do require considerable power so you might
want
> to consider making a 10 X AA cell (NiMH rechargeable? ) sled if you
> want to record or monitor for long periods of time. Rob D.
> --
>




      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU