naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Man made noise and nature recording

Subject: Re: Man made noise and nature recording
From: "John Hartog" hartogj
Date: Wed May 30, 2007 10:28 am ((PDT))
Hi Scott,

The line is of course fuzzy. A nature sound recording can have
non-natural sounds as long as they do not dominate the recording.
Flocks of domestic sheep or goats would fall under livestock
recordings I think.

- John Hartog


> John, where do you draw the line between natural & non-natural? Among =

> my favorite field recordings are a series of tapes of a flock of
> sheep I recorded in an alpine meadow east of Cedar Breaks in southern =

> Utah. Wonderful stuff, & except for one passby of a pickup truck,
> without human sonic imprint. Except for the fact that the sheep were
> bred, raised, corralled, & transported to the meadow by humans
> specifically for human consumption. So are these sheep calling back & =

> forth to their kids natural or not, inasmuch as their very existence
> is a result of human activity? Does the question even matter? And do
> I even bring up a recording I made in Bavaria of a flock of goats
> with bells around their necks? All the sonic activity is generated by =

> the goats, but humans have fitted them with bells. So is this a
> nature recording?
>
> Scott Fraser
>
>
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU