Subject: | A sixth element in recording quality |
---|---|
From: | "oryoki2000" oryoki2000 |
Date: | Fri May 25, 2007 10:00 pm ((PDT)) |
"geopaul7" wrote: > ...these elements affect the quality of > a nature sound recording: > 1. Fieldcraft > 2. Technique > 3. Microphone > 4. Preamp > 5. Recording Device I think a sixth element should be post-production wizardry. Many good recordings are made better through a little processing after the recorder's "stop" button is pushed. Like Klas's remark, "microphones are not ears," suggests, all recordings are approximations of reality. Post- processing adds quality to that approximation. --oryoki |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Because She Asked..., davidbarnas@aim.com |
Previous by Thread: | Because She Asked..., Curt Olson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [SPAM][Nature Recordists] Ochoco Mountains Mystery, M, J, & V Phinney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU