Subject: | 8. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science? |
---|---|
From: | "Rich Peet" richpeet |
Date: | Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:01 pm ((PDT)) |
Or more. Think about switchable patterns. I will likely go 8 channel but few will follow. More than happy to come to you, but like others say there is very little money that drives all of this. If not possible, please think about new size options for discs and new patterns of capsules in different places with switches to control the pattern. Rich --- In Klas Strandberg <> wrote: > > Suppose you have a three-channel recorder. > Suppose you feed two channels with a binaural mic. > Suppose you feed one channel with a mono parabol. > > Voila, it's the stereo DATmic... or??? > > Klas. > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 7. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | 1. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Antonio Celis |
Next by Thread: | 9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU