naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?

Subject: 9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?
From: "Klas Strandberg" klasstrandberg
Date: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:11 pm ((PDT))
Rich, I am only trying to explain what the Stereo DATmic might be
looked upon as....

Klas.


At 03:00 2007-04-14, you wrote:
>Or more.
>Think about switchable patterns.  I will likely go 8 channel but few
>will follow.
>
>More than happy to come to you, but like others say there is very
>little money that drives all of this.
>
>If not possible, please think about new size options for discs and new
>patterns of capsules in different places with switches to control the
>pattern.
>
>Rich
>
>--- In  Klas Strandberg <>
>wrote:
> >
> > Suppose you have a three-channel recorder.
> > Suppose you feed two channels with a binaural mic.
> > Suppose you feed one channel with a mono parabol.
> >
> > Voila, it's the stereo DATmic... or???
> >
> > Klas.
> >
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email: 
website: www.telinga.com







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU