| Subject: | 10. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rich Peet" richpeet |
| Date: | Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:40 pm ((PDT)) |
Ok. I am only trying to go to the next generation. You should not be happy where you are at. I am not and can do better. Rich --- In Klas Strandberg <> wrote: > > Rich, I am only trying to explain what the Stereo DATmic might be > looked upon as.... > > Klas. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 11. Re: Mixing Klas' Warbler (was Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | 9. Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT compared with Twin Science?, Klas Strandberg |
| Next by Thread: | 11. Re: Mixing Klas' Warbler (was Re: Telinga Stereo-DAT, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU