naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Telinga Twin Science

Subject: Re: Telinga Twin Science
From: "Andy Wilson" soundraider_uk
Date: Wed Mar 7, 2007 4:42 pm ((PST))
Klas

Klas Strandberg wrote:
> Did the picture at my gallery make sense to you?

yes. largely because i own one of those mics - a telinga with a twin
science mic.

> I got a mail from Doug about someone who wanted a cable with 5 pole XLR.
> Is that you? Such a cable can easily be fixed. There is no other
> supplier. It's special.

yes. that's me. please sell me a cable. i am just a just a humble
consumer, trying to buy the appropriate cable. i have bought a pro-6
handle, a telinga parabola & a twin-science mic. now i just want to buy
the appropriate connectors / adapters. i apologize if this is a bit
mundane for you, but would appreciate the help.

>
> Klas.
>
> At 17:00 2007-03-07, you wrote:
>  >hello klas
>  >
>  >I for one don't claim to understand mic statistics and figures. on the
>  >contrary, i'm trying to learn to understand by comparing mics, etc. One
>  >reason i would find statistics and measurements useful is precisely so
>  >that i can try the mics and see what the figures mean in practice.
>  >
>  >it's not a theoretical question for me, and i did not intend to use the
>  >information to make an easy purchasing decision, as i already bought a
>  >Telinga and Twin Science mic (it arrived today).
>  >
>  >Since I have your attention, can i also ask if you know of a supplier
>  >who can sell me an adapter to go from the 7-pin socket on the Pro-6
>  >handle to a 5-pin XLR male - i have a long 5-pin to 5-pin XLR lead
>  >already and would like to use this instead of two regular cables, so i
>  >am looking for something to replace the 7-pin to 2 * 5-pin xlr
>  >y-splitter that comes with the Telinga.
>  >
>  >thanks in anticipation
>  >
>  >andy wilson
>  >
>  >ps. i am sending this to the list rather than direct as mails to
>  > <telinga%40bahnhof.se> from get get rejected=

> as spam =3D:-0
>  >
>  >a
>  >
>  >Klas Strandberg wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > First: Use only http://www.telinga.com <http://www.telinga.com>
> <http://www.telinga.com <http://www.telinga.com>>
>  > > Otherwise you come to a site without the left margin.
>  > >
>  > > There are many reasons why I have never encouraged a "tech-talk"
>  > > about Telinga and never spread around "spec's" of different kinds.
>  > >
>  > > A Telinga is a parabolic microphone and there are no good comparison=
s
>  > > with other similar gears.
>  > > There is a continuos update all the time, and some data a certain da=
y
>  > > will be old only a few weeks later.
>  > >
>  > > Then, and this is difficult, - I would like to speak the truth, as
>  > > far as I understand it, which is difficult when so many others boost
>  > > all figures as much as they do nowadays.
>  > > Manufacturers who are exposed to a high modern competition on their
>  > > market, MUST reason the wrong way, that is: "Those data we get are
>  > > too poor, compared to others. Therefore we must have made poor
>  > > measurements."
>  > > Within a margin, it is always possible to "measure" in a commerciall=
y
>  > > more suitable way, than right.
>  > >
>  > > The "tech spec's" world is a sort of "meta-world", and I have
>  > > consciously tried to stay out of it. When I speak about Telinga, I
>  > > prefer to point out lightweight and flexibility and I say that the
>  > > output impedance is 200 Ohms and that the output voltage is "high
>  > > enough" for most recorder inputs.
>  > > For the ones who are really interested, and can understand what
>  > > spec's really mean, and evaluate spec's in a sensible way - such
>  > > people are much appreciated to call or mail me.
>  > > But I have been able to make a "good enough" frequency measurement,
>  > > and there is a picture at my site.
>  > >
>  > > I have been on this list for quite some time now. I think the
>  > > discussion about mic's in general has made enormous progress. When I
>  > > started Telinga in 1982, "impedance-matching" was the word on every
>  > > recordists lips. I am so relieved that the discussion nowadays is
>  > > much broader than that.
>  > > I'm especially grateful to Rob, who continuously has come back to th=
e
>  > > difficult relationship discussion about self-noise, sensitivity,
>  > > output voltage e.t.c - which is exactly the discussion needed for th=
e
>  > > typical naturesoundrecordist.
>  > >
>  > > I hope you find what you look for at my site, Andy! Otherwise, I wil=
l
>  > > try to answer all questions as good as I can.
>  > >
>  > > Best wishes and good recording!
>  > >
>  > > Klas.
>  > >
>  > > >Andy,
>  > > >Check with Klas at his site http://www.telinga.com/home.htm
> <http://www.telinga.com/home.htm>
>  > > <http://www.telinga.com/home.htm <http://www.telinga.com/home.htm>>
>  > > >
>  > > >Enjoy!
>  > > > J.
>  > > >



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU