Spam?? Strange.
Ah, you mean "the other way around"? That's a good idea.
However, there are no mic's to compare with, except if you leave the
Telinga approach and make your own parabol.
Did the picture at my gallery make sense to you?
I got a mail from Doug about someone who wanted a cable with 5 pole XLR.
Is that you? Such a cable can easily be fixed. There is no other
supplier. It's special.
Klas.
At 17:00 2007-03-07, you wrote:
>hello klas
>
>I for one don't claim to understand mic statistics and figures. on the
>contrary, i'm trying to learn to understand by comparing mics, etc. One
>reason i would find statistics and measurements useful is precisely so
>that i can try the mics and see what the figures mean in practice.
>
>it's not a theoretical question for me, and i did not intend to use the
>information to make an easy purchasing decision, as i already bought a
>Telinga and Twin Science mic (it arrived today).
>
>Since I have your attention, can i also ask if you know of a supplier
>who can sell me an adapter to go from the 7-pin socket on the Pro-6
>handle to a 5-pin XLR male - i have a long 5-pin to 5-pin XLR lead
>already and would like to use this instead of two regular cables, so i
>am looking for something to replace the 7-pin to 2 * 5-pin xlr
>y-splitter that comes with the Telinga.
>
>thanks in anticipation
>
>andy wilson
>
>ps. i am sending this to the list rather than direct as mails to
> from get get rejected as spam =3D:-0
>
>a
>
>Klas Strandberg wrote:
> >
> >
> > First: Use only http://www.telinga.com <http://www.telinga.com>
> > Otherwise you come to a site without the left margin.
> >
> > There are many reasons why I have never encouraged a "tech-talk"
> > about Telinga and never spread around "spec's" of different kinds.
> >
> > A Telinga is a parabolic microphone and there are no good comparisons
> > with other similar gears.
> > There is a continuos update all the time, and some data a certain day
> > will be old only a few weeks later.
> >
> > Then, and this is difficult, - I would like to speak the truth, as
> > far as I understand it, which is difficult when so many others boost
> > all figures as much as they do nowadays.
> > Manufacturers who are exposed to a high modern competition on their
> > market, MUST reason the wrong way, that is: "Those data we get are
> > too poor, compared to others. Therefore we must have made poor
> > measurements."
> > Within a margin, it is always possible to "measure" in a commercially
> > more suitable way, than right.
> >
> > The "tech spec's" world is a sort of "meta-world", and I have
> > consciously tried to stay out of it. When I speak about Telinga, I
> > prefer to point out lightweight and flexibility and I say that the
> > output impedance is 200 Ohms and that the output voltage is "high
> > enough" for most recorder inputs.
> > For the ones who are really interested, and can understand what
> > spec's really mean, and evaluate spec's in a sensible way - such
> > people are much appreciated to call or mail me.
> > But I have been able to make a "good enough" frequency measurement,
> > and there is a picture at my site.
> >
> > I have been on this list for quite some time now. I think the
> > discussion about mic's in general has made enormous progress. When I
> > started Telinga in 1982, "impedance-matching" was the word on every
> > recordists lips. I am so relieved that the discussion nowadays is
> > much broader than that.
> > I'm especially grateful to Rob, who continuously has come back to the
> > difficult relationship discussion about self-noise, sensitivity,
> > output voltage e.t.c - which is exactly the discussion needed for the
> > typical naturesoundrecordist.
> >
> > I hope you find what you look for at my site, Andy! Otherwise, I will
> > try to answer all questions as good as I can.
> >
> > Best wishes and good recording!
> >
> > Klas.
> >
> > >Andy,
> > >Check with Klas at his site http://www.telinga.com/home.htm
> > <http://www.telinga.com/home.htm>
> > >
> > >Enjoy!
> > > J.
> > >
|