Subject: | Re: interview with Steven Feld |
---|---|
From: | "Danny Meltzer" dannymeltzer |
Date: | Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:34 pm (PDT) |
There's > no substitute for a "great" field recording but creating 9-12 of > these for a CD is a huge challenge for the best of recordists. > Likewise, doing "nothing" with a recording in post can be a poor > choice if one is trying to faithfully reproduce something. Perhaps > the only good "answer" to this dilemma is being personally engaged in > learning more about the options-- from mics, rigs and positioning-- > all the way through post. Rob D. Rob I whole heartedly agree with you...this is the way I try to see things. As long as you are thoughtful and proactive about the choices you make, you are on the right track. As far as the Spectrasonics Atmosphers software...all I see is this: http://www.spectrasonics.net/instruments/atmosphere.html which is a synth. That's pretty ballsy to use on a nature recording. Is that what Feld used? Danny |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: interview with Steven Feld, Danny Meltzer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | "Worst Commercial Internet Site Award" was interview with Steven Fel, Volker Widmann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: interview with Steven Feld, Danny Meltzer |
Next by Thread: | Re: interview with Steven Feld, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU