| Subject: | Re: Current HiMD recorder choices, noise questions |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" |
| Date: | Wed May 31, 2006 8:54 pm (PDT) |
At 10:44 PM +0000 5/31/06, jpbeale wrote: > >1) How does the mechanically generated acoustic noise from the HiMD >units compare with older MD devices? About the same loudness and cycle. The hi frequency disk writing sounds can be absorbed by surrounding the unit in a dense material like thick leather. > > >2) Are all HiMD units with mic inputs equivalent for noise performance? >Rob's tests refer to the MZ-NH900 which seems to be discontinued. Does >the MZ-RH10 or MZ-RH910 have the same preamp? My 910's mic pre performs identically to my 900's and a recordist who owns a 910 and a RH-10 says they're matched as well. > I see the MZ-RH1 claims a mic input but it seems not to be available yet= . The Sound Pros are saying "June." There's a report by Andrew about the MZ-RH1 a few days back. Rob D. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: thunderstorm recording, David Westling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Nature Sounds Society 22nd Annual Field Workshop June 23 -- 25, 20=, sperry1969 |
| Previous by Thread: | Current HiMD recorder choices, noise questions, jpbeale |
| Next by Thread: | Re: minidisc data recovery, oryoki2000 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU