naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Current HiMD recorder choices, noise questions

Subject: Re: Current HiMD recorder choices, noise questions
From: "Curt Olson"
Date: Fri Jun 2, 2006 7:53 am (PDT)
Oops. I meant to say...

jpbeale wrote:

>> 2) Are all HiMD units with mic inputs equivalent for noise
>> performance? Rob's tests refer to the MZ-NH900 which seems to be
>> discontinued. Does the MZ-RH10 or MZ-RH910 have the same preamp?

Rob Danielson replied:

> My 910's mic pre performs identically to my 900's and a recordist who
> owns a 910 and a RH-10 says they're matched as well.


On Jun 2, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Curt Olson wrote:

> jpbeale wrote:
>
>>> 2) Are all HiMD units with mic inputs equivalent for noise
>>> performance? Rob's tests refer to the MZ-NH900 which seems to be
>>> discontinued. Does the MZ-RH10 or MZ-RH910 have the same preamp?
>>
>> My 910's mic pre performs identically to my 900's and a recordist who
>> owns a 910 and a RH-10 says they're matched as well.
>
> I have several Sony mobile recorders including Hi-MD, DAT and the tiny
> NT-1 Micro-DAT. To my ear, they all sound pretty much the same -- very
> nice.
>
> Curt Olson




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU