Subject: | Re: Strange results with mkh 20? |
---|---|
From: | "Eric Benjamin" <> |
Date: | Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:10:43 -0800 |
"Romilly Hambling" wrote > our recording sessions with a > a hired pair of Sennheiser mkh 20s (omnis) > and am totally baffled by the poor quality. Romilly, Without having the mics at hand for instrumented testing, I can only say that it sounds to me as though the mikes are busted (that's American for "don't work properly"). I would take them back to the hire shop and demand= my money back. Then use the AT3032s. In a side-by-side simultaneous recording with two Schoeps MK2s, we found th= e AT3032s to be nearly indistinguishable from the Schoeps. The Schoeps was slightly preferred unless things were really quiet, at which point the AT3032s were preferred. The difference was extremely subtle. Eric |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Strange results with mkh 20?, Wild Sanctuary |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Is it a Field Sparrow?, Stan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange results with mkh 20?, Wild Sanctuary |
Next by Thread: | Re: Strange results with mkh 20?, Romilly Hambling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU