Subject: | Re: Is it a Field Sparrow? |
---|---|
From: | "Stan" <> |
Date: | Sat, 01 Apr 2006 23:14:31 -0000 |
Thanks everyone for the help. Stan --- In "Rich Peet" <> wrote: > > --- In "Stan" <stancourtney@> wrote: > > > > It seemed to fit the cd's but I thought I would ask before I put it on > > my website. > > > > http://www.stancourtney.com/birdandanimalsounds/MysteryBird5.mp3 > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stan Courtney in Central Illinois > > http://www.stancourtney.com/ > > > > Yes, no two sound identical. This one is a bit more mono-tone than > most. Makes it a bit less "pretty" but I am sure he doesn't think so. > > Rich > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Strange results with mkh 20?, Eric Benjamin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Strange results with mkh 20?, Romilly Hambling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Is it a Field Sparrow?, Rich Peet |
Next by Thread: | Re: Digest Number 2079 Is it a Field Sparrow?, Meena Haribal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU