Subject: | Re: should we change the name of this group to geartalk |
---|---|
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:42:34 +0100 (CET) |
And maybe we should clean up our messages before posting... Two lines of useful text vs. 331 lines of "trash" in some posts yesterday -- e.g. the "Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:59:59 -0700" post. This group becomes hard to read when posts like that are encapsulated in a "digest" daily message. Thanks! Matt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Uses of recordings, Steve Pelikan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New file uploaded to naturerecordists, naturerecordists |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Re: should we change the name of this group to geartalk, Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | Re: should we change the name of this group to geartalk, Tim Gray |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU