| Subject: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test#2 |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Hartog" <> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:02:05 -0000 |
Thanks again Rob, for taking the time to make these helpful comparisons. I was expecting a greater improvement for the MT by adding the MP2. -John Hartog --- In Rob Danielson <> wrote: > http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Mic%20Preamps/MicroTrack_NH900_722Compare2.mov > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: questions, Ken Durling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test#2, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test#2, Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 722 HiMD MicroTrack Test#2, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU