Subject: | humidity and condoms |
---|---|
From: | Rob Danielson <> |
Date: | Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:33:32 -0600 |
I came across a discussion on the proweb list with several accounts reporting that condoms work well against moisture and without huge impact on sound quality. If this is true, why wouldn't one routinely enclose mics before taking them into humid situations? Klas, what kind of impact on sound quality can one expect? Sensitivity? Tone? Rob D. At 11:26 AM +0200 7/24/03, Klas Strandberg wrote: >Most mic's work fine with a condom over the membrane. Not perfect, but... > >Klas. -- Rob Danielson Film Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Playback, Neville Recording |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: <$500US/pair low-profile stereo mics (was preamp, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Playback, Neville Recording |
Next by Thread: | Re: humidity and condoms, Henry Howard |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU