[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 722 vs PMD670

Subject: Re: 722 vs PMD670
From: "oryoki2000" <>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:29:36 -0000
It's no surprise that the 722's recording is cleaner and quieter than
the PMD670's.  After all, the 722 costs three times as much, can
digitize at 24/192 (vs 16/48 on the PMD670), and claims a preamp noise
floor of -130 dB (vs -65 dB).  It would be news if the 722 *didn't*
sound cleaner.  

Martyn's recording helps us undestand how these technical advantages
translate into performance in the field.  Thanks!



"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU