Subject: | Re: Introduction & Difficult Speech Problem |
---|---|
From: | Walter Knapp <> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:15:41 -0400 |
From: "kennjava" <> >>> Precisely. A high-pass filter would do the same thing more cleanly. > > > Sure, but a high pass will cut EVERYTHING, possibly including > frequencies of interest. Which is why I've so strongly advocated doing sound processing with a realtime sonogram in play. Then you know if you are cutting into wanted sound. And you can do a better filtering job. While I've not analyzed the speech of this species, I'd not be too surprised if the frequency variation is small. That's the way it is with mockingbirds, they imitate a wide range of call patterns and frequencies, but the frequencies they use to do it are very limited. It is a monotone, and this could be at the root of the problems folks have understanding your bird. Worth checking anyway. Walt ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: What's Up When Birds Sing?, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Marantz PMD660 question, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Introduction & Difficult Speech Problem, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: What's Up When Birds Sing?, Jeffrey D. Daub |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU