naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Renewed interest

Subject: Renewed interest
From: "Ryan" <>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:45:42 -0000
I have been a member of this group for some time now, but not very
active, with the work situation I haven't had much time for anything
else.
Way back there was a popular concensus that minidisc recorders were
not the best choice for nature recording, for reasons I cannot
recall, is this still the popular opinion?
The reason I brought this up is a few weeks ago I was a farm show and
all the radio stations doing their thing used minidisc machines, I
asked one of the guys what he was using, he said minidisc, and they
used to use DAT, but it didn't work as well as the md. Yes I know
there is a major difference in recording human voices in a building
and nature recording, two totally different venues.





________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU